TSTP Solution File: GEG008^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GEG008^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ymQHgiXfAS true
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:42:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.59s 0.94s
% Output : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : GEG008^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ymQHgiXfAS true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:15:26 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.36 % Running in HO mode
% 0.56/0.68 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.56/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.56/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.56/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.57/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.58/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.58/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.58/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s
% 0.58/0.83 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s
% 0.59/0.94 % Solved by lams/30_b.l.sh.
% 0.59/0.94 % done 82 iterations in 0.113s
% 0.59/0.94 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.59/0.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.59/0.94 thf(reg_type, type, reg: $tType).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(mbox_type, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(paris_type, type, paris: reg).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(ntpp_type, type, ntpp: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(a_type, type, a: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(pp_type, type, pp: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(eq_type, type, eq: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(france_type, type, france: reg).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(ec_type, type, ec: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('#sk3_type', type, '#sk3': reg > reg).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('#form4_type', type, '#form4': reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(o_type, type, o: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('#sk2_type', type, '#sk2': $i).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(c_type, type, c: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('#sk1_type', type, '#sk1': $i).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(p_type, type, p: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(catalunya_type, type, catalunya: reg).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(spain_type, type, spain: reg).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(tpp_type, type, tpp: reg > reg > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(mvalid_type, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(con, conjecture,
% 0.59/0.94 (mvalid @
% 0.59/0.94 ( mbox @
% 0.59/0.94 a @
% 0.59/0.94 ( ^[X:$i]: ( ( eq @ catalunya @ paris ) => ( o @ france @ spain ) ) ) ))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.59/0.94 (~( mvalid @
% 0.59/0.94 ( mbox @
% 0.59/0.94 a @
% 0.59/0.94 ( ^[X:$i]: ( ( eq @ catalunya @ paris ) => ( o @ france @ spain ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [con])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (mvalid @
% 0.59/0.94 (mbox @ a @
% 0.59/0.94 (^[Y0 : $i]: (((eq @ catalunya @ paris) => (o @ france @ spain))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(mvalid, axiom, ~ (mvalid @ X0) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) != ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('0', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:( $i > $o )]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( ~( mvalid @ X0 ) ) <=> ( ~( ![X5:$i]: ( X0 @ X5 ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [mvalid])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (mbox @ a @
% 0.59/0.94 (^[Y1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((eq @ catalunya @ paris) => (o @ france @ spain)))) @
% 0.59/0.94 Y0))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, '0'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (mbox @ a @
% 0.59/0.94 (^[Y0 : $i]: (((eq @ catalunya @ paris) => (o @ france @ spain)))) @
% 0.59/0.94 '#sk1')),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_exists', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(mbox, axiom, ~ (mbox @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((((~) @ (X0 @ X2 @ Y0))) | (X1 @ Y0)))))) !=
% 0.59/0.94 ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('1', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:( $i > $i > $o ),X1:( $i > $o ),X2:$i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( ~( mbox @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) <=>
% 0.59/0.94 ( ~( ![X7:$i]: ( ( ~( X0 @ X2 @ X7 ) ) | ( X1 @ X7 ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [mbox])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ '#sk1' @ Y0))) |
% 0.59/0.94 ((^[Y1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((eq @ catalunya @ paris) => (o @ france @ spain)))) @
% 0.59/0.94 Y0))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, '1'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ '#sk1' @ Y0))) |
% 0.59/0.94 (((eq @ catalunya @ paris) => (o @ france @ spain))))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('ho_norm', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((((~) @ (a @ '#sk1' @ '#sk2'))) |
% 0.59/0.94 (((eq @ catalunya @ paris) => (o @ france @ spain)))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_exists', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((eq @ catalunya @ paris) => (o @ france @ spain)))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_or', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, ( (eq @ catalunya @ paris)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(eq, axiom, (eq @ X0 @ X1) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((p @ X1 @ X0) & (p @ X0 @ X1))) = ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('2', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:reg,X1:reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 ) <=> ( ( p @ X0 @ X1 ) & ( p @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [eq])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((p @ paris @ catalunya) & (p @ catalunya @ paris)))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, '2'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, ( (p @ paris @ catalunya)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_and', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(p, axiom, (p @ X0 @ X1) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ X1)))))) = ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('3', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:reg,X1:reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( p @ X0 @ X1 ) <=>
% 0.59/0.94 ( ![X6:reg]: ( ( c @ X6 @ X0 ) => ( c @ X6 @ X1 ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [p])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ paris) => (c @ Y0 @ catalunya))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, '3'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X2 : reg]: (((c @ X2 @ paris) => (c @ X2 @ catalunya)))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl23])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X2 : reg]: (~ (c @ X2 @ paris) | (c @ X2 @ catalunya))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (~ (o @ france @ spain)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(o, axiom, ~ (o @ X0 @ X1) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((??) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((p @ Y0 @ X0) & (p @ Y0 @ X1)))))) != ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('4', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:reg,X1:reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( ~( o @ X0 @ X1 ) ) <=>
% 0.59/0.94 ( ~( ?[X6:reg]: ( ( p @ X6 @ X0 ) & ( p @ X6 @ X1 ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [o])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((??) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((p @ Y0 @ france) & (p @ Y0 @ spain))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, '4'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X2 : reg]: ~ (((p @ X2 @ france) & (p @ X2 @ spain)))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X2 : reg]: (~ (p @ X2 @ france) | ~ (p @ X2 @ spain))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_and', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl22])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(p, axiom, ~ (p @ X0 @ X1) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ X1)))))) != ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('5', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:reg,X1:reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( ~( p @ X0 @ X1 ) ) <=>
% 0.59/0.94 ( ~( ![X6:reg]: ( ( c @ X6 @ X0 ) => ( c @ X6 @ X1 ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [p])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france))))))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (p @ X0 @ spain))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, '5'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ spain))))))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl28, '5'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (((c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ X0) => (c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ spain)))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_exists', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ X0)
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ X0)
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ('#form4' @ X0)
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 define([status(thm)])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]: (~ ('#form4' @ X0) | (c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('renaming', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl35])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl249, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (( (c @ ('#sk3' @ paris) @ catalunya) | ~ ('#form4' @ paris))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl37])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(ax3, axiom,
% 0.59/0.94 (mvalid @ ( mbox @ a @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( ntpp @ paris @ france ) ) ))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 ( (mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (ntpp @ paris @ france))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax3])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(mvalid, axiom, (mvalid @ X0) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (X0 @ Y0)))) = ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('6', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:( $i > $o )]: ( ( mvalid @ X0 ) <=> ( ![X5:$i]: ( X0 @ X5 ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [mvalid])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl112, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (mbox @ a @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (ntpp @ paris @ france)) @ Y0))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, '6'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X2 : $i]: (mbox @ a @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (ntpp @ paris @ france)) @ X2)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl112])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(mbox, axiom, (mbox @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((((~) @ (X0 @ X2 @ Y0))) | (X1 @ Y0)))))) =
% 0.59/0.94 ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('7', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:( $i > $i > $o ),X1:( $i > $o ),X2:$i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) <=>
% 0.59/0.94 ( ![X7:$i]: ( ( ~( X0 @ X2 @ X7 ) ) | ( X1 @ X7 ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [mbox])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl114, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ X0 @ Y0))) |
% 0.59/0.94 ((^[Y1 : $i]: (ntpp @ paris @ france)) @ Y0))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl113, '7'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl115, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ X0 @ Y0))) | (ntpp @ paris @ france))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('ho_norm', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl114])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl116, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ X0 @ X2))) | (ntpp @ paris @ france)))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl115])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl117, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X2 : $i]: (~ (a @ X0 @ X2) | (ntpp @ paris @ france))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_or', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl116])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(ntpp, axiom, (ntpp @ X0 @ X1) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((ec @ Y0 @ X0) & (ec @ Y0 @ X1)))))))) &
% 0.59/0.94 (pp @ X0 @ X1)))
% 0.59/0.94 = ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('8', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:reg,X1:reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( ntpp @ X0 @ X1 ) <=>
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( pp @ X0 @ X1 ) &
% 0.59/0.94 ( ~( ?[X6:reg]: ( ( ec @ X6 @ X0 ) & ( ec @ X6 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [ntpp])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((((~) @ (((??) @ (^[Y0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((ec @ Y0 @ paris) & (ec @ Y0 @ france)))))))) &
% 0.59/0.94 (pp @ paris @ france)))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl117, '8'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl120, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (pp @ paris @ france) | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_and', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl118])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(pp, axiom, (pp @ X0 @ X1) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((((~) @ (p @ X1 @ X0))) & (p @ X0 @ X1))) = ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('9', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:reg,X1:reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( pp @ X0 @ X1 ) <=> ( ( p @ X0 @ X1 ) & ( ~( p @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [pp])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl122, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((((~) @ (p @ france @ paris))) & (p @ paris @ france)))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl120, '9'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl125, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p @ paris @ france) | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_and', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl122])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl128, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ paris) => (c @ Y0 @ france))))))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl125, '3'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl128, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ paris) => (c @ Y0 @ france))))))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl125, '3'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl131, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (~ ('#form4' @ X0)
% 0.59/0.94 | (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 define([status(thm)])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ('#form4' @ X0)
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 define([status(thm)])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl133, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( ('#form4' @ paris) | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('renaming', [status(thm)],
% 0.59/0.94 [zip_derived_cl128, zip_derived_cl131, zip_derived_cl35])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, ( (a @ '#sk1' @ '#sk2')),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_or', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl242, plain, ( ('#form4' @ paris)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl133, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl255, plain, ( (c @ ('#sk3' @ paris) @ catalunya)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl249, zip_derived_cl242])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(ax1, axiom,
% 0.59/0.94 (mvalid @ ( mbox @ a @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( tpp @ catalunya @ spain ) ) ))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 ( (mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (tpp @ catalunya @ spain))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax1])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl42, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (mbox @ a @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (tpp @ catalunya @ spain)) @ Y0))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, '6'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl43, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X2 : $i]: (mbox @ a @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (tpp @ catalunya @ spain)) @ X2)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl42])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl44, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ X0 @ Y0))) |
% 0.59/0.94 ((^[Y1 : $i]: (tpp @ catalunya @ spain)) @ Y0))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl43, '7'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl45, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ X0 @ Y0))) | (tpp @ catalunya @ spain))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('ho_norm', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl44])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl46, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((((~) @ (a @ X0 @ X2))) | (tpp @ catalunya @ spain)))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl45])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl47, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X2 : $i]: (~ (a @ X0 @ X2) | (tpp @ catalunya @ spain))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_or', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl46])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(tpp, axiom, (tpp @ X0 @ X1) =>
% 0.59/0.94 ((((((??) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((ec @ Y0 @ X0) & (ec @ Y0 @ X1)))))) & (pp @
% 0.59/0.94 X0 @ X1)))
% 0.59/0.94 = ($true))).
% 0.59/0.94 thf('10', plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0:reg,X1:reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( tpp @ X0 @ X1 ) <=>
% 0.59/0.94 ( ( pp @ X0 @ X1 ) &
% 0.59/0.94 ( ?[X6:reg]: ( ( ec @ X6 @ X0 ) & ( ec @ X6 @ X1 ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw.lit', [status(esa)], [tpp])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl48, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((((??) @ (^[Y0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (((ec @ Y0 @ catalunya) & (ec @ Y0 @ spain)))))) &
% 0.59/0.94 (pp @ catalunya @ spain)))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl47, '10'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (pp @ catalunya @ spain) | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_and', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl48])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((((~) @ (p @ spain @ catalunya))) & (p @ catalunya @ spain)))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl50, '9'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p @ catalunya @ spain) | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_and', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl52])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl60, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ catalunya) => (c @ Y0 @ spain))))))
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('rw_clause', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl56, '3'])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl66, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X3 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( (((c @ X3 @ catalunya) => (c @ X3 @ spain))) | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl60])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl71, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X3 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (c @ X3 @ catalunya) | (c @ X3 @ spain) | ~ (a @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl66])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, ( (a @ '#sk1' @ '#sk2')),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_or', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl302, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]: ( (c @ X0 @ spain) | ~ (c @ X0 @ catalunya))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl71, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 (~ (c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ spain)
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]:
% 0.59/0.94 ( ('#form4' @ X0)
% 0.59/0.94 | ~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : reg]: (((c @ Y0 @ X0) => (c @ Y0 @ france)))))))),
% 0.59/0.94 define([status(thm)])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]: (~ ('#form4' @ X0) | ~ (c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ spain))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('renaming', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl35])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain,
% 0.59/0.94 (![X0 : reg]: (~ (c @ ('#sk3' @ X0) @ catalunya) | ~ ('#form4' @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl302, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl402, plain, (~ ('#form4' @ paris)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl255, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl242, plain, ( ('#form4' @ paris)),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl133, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.59/0.94 thf(zip_derived_cl411, plain, ($false),
% 0.59/0.94 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl402, zip_derived_cl242])).
% 0.59/0.94
% 0.59/0.94 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.59/0.94
% 0.59/0.94
% 0.59/0.94 % Terminating...
% 0.59/1.01 % Runner terminated.
% 1.82/1.03 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------